As Vaccine Uptake Reaches All-Time Lows, Public Health Policy Now Shifts To Mandatory Enforcement and Criminalization To Those Refusing Vaccines
There's a consequence to this awakening. As more people become informed and pull away from the clutches of fear, anxiety and control that accompanies vaccination, more public health and government policy will enforce their position through aggression and threats. That alone is a clear indication of which stance holds true merit and which one doesn't.
Bullies don't like being confronted by the truth, but the truth doesn't care. That's why the anti-vaccine position roots itself largely from a non-violent, passive and informed approach. They are mostly indifferent about vaccinators injecting themselves and their children and feel if they must continue the practice, they have the right to their opinion. On the other hand, most in the pro-vaccination camp are very angry, antagonistic and don't believe anybody who disagrees with them has that right. Anti-vaccine proponents are a risk to us all and they must be imprisoned or exiled.
The future of vaccination, if it has a future, will not be one in compliance through force. The imposition of mandatory vaccination (or its illusion) is perhaps the biggest mistake that public health policy and government is currently pursuing. It is working against them. It is an attempt to desperately derail growing numbers of an informed population and it will accelerate the demise of vaccination as we know it.
In the next year, there will be a massive, highly coordinated and sensationalized propaganda on behalf of pharmaceutical companies, who will use the media and public health agencies to strike fear in those thinking about not vaccinating there children. The campaign has already started as evident in measles scare heavily covered by the mainstream media.
Schools will also be changing their policies. Not only are public health entities habitually and deliberately failing to inform the public of their right to refuse vaccines in both school and work settings, but they are working towards mandatory vaccination protocols which will allow officials to conduct childhood vaccinations without any parental consent at all.
The reason is simple. The pharmaceutical companies no longer dominate the spectrum of knowledge on vaccination. The gig is up. People are no longer fooled by the fraudulent studies funded by drug companies, the hidden CDC documents now exposed, the fabrications and plots by government on flu vaccines, and the lack of safety studies in almost any area of vaccination. Big Pharma now has statistical verification that vaccine exemptions rates are at all time highs while vaccine uptake is at all-time lows. They have the data and they're desperately trying to reverse the trend.
Vaccinate and Oppose Anybody Who Disagrees
There are opinions now held by many in high levels of public health agencies and government which may soon translate into laws requiring mandatory enforcement of vaccination and the elimination of vaccine exemptions.
State legislatures are now dealing with a rash of legislation to tighten vaccination rules in reaction to the targeted media attack against the anti-vaccination movement that started with the coordinated Disneyland measles outbreak. The media outcry was designed to focus on parents who choose not to vaccinate their children. With Disneyland scare, it's now been established at least half of the Disneyland children who allegedly caught measles WERE vaccinated.
In California, a group of state legislators announced last week that they would sponsor a bill to eliminate the state's “personal belief" exemption, which includes the religious exemption, from the state's vaccination laws.
The end of exemption
laws are just one part of the equation, but there are also calls to imprison parents who don't comply and revoke the licenses of Doctors who don't comply with vaccine promotion.
Biased opinion pieces such as this one in the Washington Post claims that any doctor who opposes vaccination should have their license revoked. The author calls the anti-vaccine stance based on nothing more than anecdote, myth, hearsay, rumor, ideology and fraud. The problem is they either don't read or listen to the hundreds of scientific studies which confirm that vaccination and associated toxins are dangerous.
They want to consider counseling against vaccination as misconduct for Physicians. The claim doctors are distorting what patients need to know to preserve their health or that of their children and they have "crossed a bright red line". Do you see the problem? It's an imposition of ideals based on misinterpretations, flawed science and far reaching conclusions that they call fact. They are not fact. They are anything but fact. The only fact is that we don't know how safe or dangerous vaccines really are.
Officials at Queen's University in Canada have now launched an investigation into claims that a health studies instructor has been teaching anti-vaccination materials in a first-year level course. They go as far as to state that "the tone of it is clearly skewed to 'vaccine is bad,'" he said. "It's got elements of truth to it, which make it slightly credible. But there are a lot of things in it which are not correct." The question is who can make the judgement that it is correct?
USA Today columnist Alex Berezow headlines an aggressive pro-vaccine rant stating that "Parents who do not vaccinate their children should go to jail." His position is that no matter how toxic the vaccine ingredients really are, parents who do not comply with vaccination should be thrown in prison.
The message is clear: any parents who might have genuine personal and family health concerns regarding risky vaccines, are “putting the public safety at risk and therefore must comply". In the wake of this crisis, US media are currently promoting a new class of laws that will eliminate a parent and student's ability to obtain a ‘waiver' for mandatory vaccinations. In other words, if you do not get all the vaccines which the state demands, then you will be breaking the law.
Vaccines Will Not Prevent The Spread of Measles and Other Diseases
Even Dr. Gregory Poland, one of the world's most admired, most advanced thinkers in the field of vaccinology, has stated that the measles vaccine has failed. Dr. Poland often stressed that a more fundamental problem stems from the vaccine being less effective in real life than predicted, with a too-high failure rate -- between 2% and 10% don't develop expected antibodies after receiving the recommended two shots. Because different people have different genetic makeups, the vaccine is simply a dud in many, failing to provide the protection they think they've acquired.
To make matters worse, even when the vaccine takes, the protection quickly wanes, making it unrealistic to achieve the 95%-plus level of immunity in the general population.
The answer, according to Dr. Poland, lies in our genes. Because of their genetic predisposition, some people will not respond to the current measles vaccine, even with additional boosters. By the same token, the genetic predisposition of others makes them susceptible to harm from the measles vaccine, leading to public wariness, including among the well educated. What is needed, suggests Dr. Poland, is for the public health establishment to accept that the current measles vaccine has so many drawbacks as to make it unworkable.
20 years ago, scientists working at the CDC's National Center for Infectious Diseases, funded by the WHO and the National Vaccine Program, discovered something truly disturbing about the MMR vaccine: it leads to detectable measles infection in the vast majority of those who receive it.
Another issue at hand is the diagnosis of measles when it may not be measles at all. Most doctors and parents don't know that the CDC warns, "During outbreaks, measles vaccine is administered to help control the outbreak, and in these situations, vaccine reactions may be mistakenly classified as measles cases. A small proportion of measles vaccine recipients experience rash and fever 10-14 days following vaccination."
Yes, MMR vaccine can cause vaccine strain measles infection that looks just like measles. Plus, other common viral infections -- like adenovirus infections -- can look just like measles with rash, fever and conjunctivitis symptoms, and be misdiagnosed as measles UNLESS there is expensive RNA lab testing done to confirm that what looks like measles really is wild type measles.
The National Vaccine Information Center has published an important document relevant to this topic titled "The Emerging Risks of Live Virus & Virus Vectored Vaccines: Vaccine Strain Virus Infection, Shedding & Transmission." Pages 34-36 in the section on "Measles, Mumps, Rubella Viruses and Live Attenuated Measles, Mumps, Rubella Viruses" discuss evidence that the MMR vaccine can lead to measles infection and transmission.
In 2012, whooping cough, or pertussis, spread across the entire US at rates at least twice as high as those recorded in 2011 and epidemiologists and health officials were even admitting that the vaccine may be the cause.
In March 2012, dangerous new strains of whooping cough bacteria were reported in Australia. Researchers studying the strains said the vaccine itself was responsible. The reason for this is because, while whooping cough is primarily attributed to Bordetella pertussis infection, it is also caused by another closely related pathogen called B. parapertussis, which the vaccine does NOT protect against. Two years earlier, scientists at Penn State had already reported that the pertussis vaccine significantly enhanced the colonization of B. parapertussis, thereby promoting vaccine-resistant whooping cough outbreaks.
According to the authors:
"... [V]accination led to a 40-fold enhancement of B. parapertussis colonization in the lungs of mice. Though the mechanism behind this increased colonization was not specifically elucidated, it is speculated to involve specific immune responses skewed or dampened by the acellular vaccine, including cytokine and antibody production during infection. Despite this vaccine being hugely effective against B. pertussis, which was once the primary childhood killer, these data suggest that the vaccine may be contributing to the observed rise in whooping cough incidence over the last decade by promoting B. parapertussis infection."
Pertussis whooping cough is a cyclical disease with natural increases that tend to occur every 4-5 years, no matter how high the vaccination rate is in a population using DTP or Tdap vaccines on a widespread basis. Whole cell DTP vaccines used in the U.S. from the 1950's until the late 1990's were estimated to be 63 to 94 percent effective and studies showed that vaccine-acquired immunity fell to about 40 percent after seven years.
In the study cited above, the researchers noted the vaccine's effectiveness was only 41 percent among 2- to 7-year-olds and a dismal 24 percent among those aged 8-12
The fact that many vaccines are ineffective is becoming increasingly apparent. Merck has recently been slapped with two separate class action lawsuits contending they lied about the effectiveness of the mumps vaccine in their combination MMR shot, and fabricated efficacy studies to maintain the illusion for the past two decades that the vaccine is highly protective.
The True Statistics of Vaccination
According to the data provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), only 52.6% of long-term care healthcare professionals received a flu vaccine during the 2013-2014 flu season. The numbers for the 2014-2015 season are reportedly being estimated as even lower. For other health employees, the CDC is unfortunately misrepresenting data to make it appear as if a great population of workers are vaccinated.
"We have a problem at the CDC as they are attributing increasing rates of vaccine uptake when the opposite is occurring," said
Epidemiologist Francis Margole. "They are using data from select employers with mandatory vaccination policies and then extrapolating this data as a median across employers who do not have mandatory policies, said Margole. "We're not sure why they are proceeding to collect data in this manner, but it is not statistically accurate."
Many doctors, nurses and other health professionals are coming around and grasping the gravity of how vaccines are damaging our bodies. Turnover of nurses (RNs) are now at record highs, with more than one-third leaving their jobs within the first two years and trust in health authorities and vaccination is rapidly diminishing.
A study in Vaccine titled "What lied behind the low rates of vaccinations among nurses who treat infants?" is evidence of a growing resistance to vaccinating infants in the developed world.
More front-line workers, medical staff, nurses and hospital employees are saying no to vaccines more than ever.
Other problems relate to more nurses being pressured by doctors to mislead parents into a false sense of security while attempting to address and convince anti-vaccine parents that their misconceptions about vaccinations are based on myths.
Public Health England reported that flu vaccination rates are lower among at-risk patients under 65, with only 51% protected. Just 39.2% of pregnant women have had the jab, the lowest since 2011/12 when vaccination for these patients was introduced.
A study in plosmedicine.org found that fewer people than ever are receiving shingles vaccines.
For one of the most unscientific vaccines in the history of vaccination, the HPV vaccine uptake is now headed below 50% for the first time since it's introduction in 2006.
Two centuries of UK, USA and Australian official death statistics have shown conclusively and scientifically that modern medicine is not responsible for and played little part in substantially improved life expectancy and survival from disease in western economies.
A summary review of data on neurological adverse events and the historical role of vaccination in the natural course of infectious disease in Switzerland and Germany, supports data from other regions with evidence that vaccines had no impact on disease prevention efforts from the early-mid to late 20th century.
Flu statistics are perhaps the most flawed.The CDC has been caught contradicting itself on the actual number of yearly deaths caused by influenza. For years, the CDC has been citing an annual estimate of 36,000 deaths from flu. That figure has been used to justify mandatory flu vaccination for children and has been parroted the world over by news organizations that never question its validity. In 2010, the CDC released new figures: rather than 36,000, the three-decade average is actually 23,607 deaths, a full one-third fewer people than previously cited. Even those figures were eventually exposed as fabricated and false.
A closer examination of the CDC's National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) figures shows that in 2001, there were only 257 deaths directly attributable to flu, and in only eighteen cases was the flu virus positively identified. Between 1979 and 2002, NCHS data show an average of 1,348 actual flu deaths per year--a mere 5.7% of the “new and improved” estimate.
With more than 200 viruses known to cause influenza-like illness (ILI), a person can get a flu shot and still become sick with what is described as “the flu”. According to CDC data, in the past 11 years, 86% of all influenza-type illnesses were NOT caused by the influenza virus, thus influenza viruses are ONLY active 14% of the time.
The proportion of ILI caused by influenza viruses varies by year, and even varies within a specific year over the course of the winter.
Therefore, under a hypothetical scenario that influenza vaccines work 25% of the time (which is marginally high percentage for flu vaccine effectiveness), that means the maximum effectiveness of the flu vaccine would be 3.5% on influenza viral strains and nil for ILI.
A recent report which was highlighted by the alternative media is a remarkable study published in the Cochrane Library which found no evidence of benefit for influenza vaccinations and also noted that the vast majority of trials were inadequate.
The authors found that vaccines administered parenterally, that is, outside the digestive tract, usually meaning by injection, reduced influenza-like symptoms by 4%. They found no evidence that vaccination prevents viral transmission putting the whole herd immunity myth once again into question.
Do You Want To Live In A World Without Free Choice?
Do you want to live in world that takes away your right to refuse medical procedures that carry a risk of injury or death? In a world where we cannot prevent our own children from drug therapy others claim is safe? Are you ready to have all your rights violated in this new era of medical tyranny at the hands of those who want complete control over your mind and body? If you answered "no" to any of the above questions, now is the time to voice your opinion. Please comment below and share your voice.
Dave Mihalovic is a Naturopathic Doctor who specializes in vaccine research, cancer prevention and a natural approach to treatment.