Prevent Disease.com - Junk Science and Contradictions Dominate WHO Pandemic Statements and Policies

The World Health Organization (WHO) claims that by employing their monitoring standards on outbreaks from different parts of the world, they are able to obtain sufficient information to make tentative conclusions about how the influenza pandemic might evolve in the coming months. Much of the clever phrasing on the WHO website is convincing enough to conceal the fact that all their pandemic policies on response and preparation recommendations are based on pure speculation and junk science.

More and more investigations on the flu pandemic hype are exposing the malicious intent by the agencies involved. The hype which has been so masterfully publicized by the WHO, CDC and other government agencies, is simply an evolving perpetual motor of deception.

Some of the myths propagated by the WHO are as follows:

WHO Claim: H1N1 is now the dominant virus strain

The WHO claims that the evidence from multiple outbreak sites demonstrates that the H1N1 pandemic virus has rapidly established itself and is now the dominant influenza strain in most parts of the world.

This is extremely deceptive of the WHO since they admit they are routinely re-categorizing a large number of cases of common influenza as H1N1 swine flu. The WHO stated in a briefing note that the "...increasing number of cases in many countries with sustained community transmission is making it extremely difficult, if not impossible, for countries to try and confirm them through laboratory testing. Moreover, the counting of individual cases is now no longer essential in such countries for monitoring either the level or nature of the risk posed by the pandemic virus or to guide implementation of the most appropriate response measures. "

They also admit that:

- they will not collect data on the spread of H1N1 based on systematic lab confirmation.

- they will discourage national health officials to conduct detection and laboratory confirmation, while also pressuring the countries' public health authorities to duly deliver to the WHO on a weekly basis the data on H1N1 cases.

- they will only refer to "confirmed cases". They do not distinguish between confirmed and non-confirmed case. It would appear that the "non-confirmed" cases are categorized as confirmed cases and the numbers are then used by the WHO to prove that the disease is spreading. (See WHO tables)

Reality: Since the swine flu has the same symptoms as seasonal influenza, the widespread incidence of the common flu is being used to generate the confirmed case H1N1/swine flu reports delivered to the WHO. Therefore, without laboratory evidence, it is impossible (scientifically or otherwise) for the WHO to ascertain any reliable evidence that H1N1 is the dominant virus strain. They routinely use such junk science in dealing with the body of pandemic facts and truths.

WHO Claim: Pandemic flu is not the same as seasonal influenza

They claim that there are differences between patterns of illness reported during the pandemic and those seen during seasonal epidemics of influenza. Specifically, they imply that age groups affected by the pandemic are generally younger than those of seasonal influenza.

The WHO is knowingly misleading the public with their claims. On their own website, they specify that "yearly influenza epidemics can seriously affect all age groups." Moreover, by insisting that "most of the severe cases and deaths have occurred in adults under the age of 50," they are specifically targeting populations with the largest demographic age group. Their intention is to endorse the greatest compliance for public administration of vaccines and the highest profits to the pharmaceutical industry. Without any scientific evidence, they promote these assumptions and advertise their fictitious data and opinions as facts.

The symptoms of seasonal influenza are known to be quite mild for the majority of the population. Coincidently, the WHO continues to define the severity of the H1N1 virus as an illness requiring neither hospitalization nor even medical care. Most cases are having mild symptoms that clear up on their own, very much like seasonal influenza. These types of contradictory statements are littered throughout the WHO literature and their policies.

Reality: There is no substantive or credible nature to this claim since the WHO will not collect data on the spread of H1N1 for ANY age group based on systematic lab confirmation. The fact that they are not distinguishing between confirmed and non-confirmed cases strongly translates this claim into pure conjecture.

WHO Claim: Pregnant Women are a vulnerable group

According to the WHO, there is an increased risk of the pandemic flu during pregnancy which is well-documented across countries. They further state that this risk takes on added significance for this virus since it preferentially infects younger people.

Pregnant women have been identified as being at high risk of complications resulting from H1N1 flu, following publication of research in the Lancet medical journal in July. As a result, officials on both sides of the Atlantic have identified mothers-to-be as priority cases for the fast-tracked vaccine, despite the fact that relatively nothing is known about the possible side effects of the vaccine on unborn babies.

Just as there was no evidence of the avian flu virus mutating to cause a pandemic, there is also no evidence of any mutagenic process involved in the H1N1 swine flu virus. Talmage Holmes, a relationship manager for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in Columbus, Ohio, states that pregnant women should not have any special worries. "Pregnant women are at no greater risk than others." says Dr. Holmes. "Until there has been mutation or re-assortment of the avian flu virus' genetic material, the risk to all humans is very low."

Reality: To date, there are NO well-documented case studies in any country that establish pregnant women as having an increased risk for pandemic flu. Globally, the effects of the H1N1 swine flu virus have been relatively mild and it has behaved no differently than any other influenza virus. The WHO is well aware of this fact despite its tireless effort to advocate the opposite by manipulating the data. By targeting pregnant women, the WHO is attempting to instigate fear which they hoped would activate the maternal protective reponse in women who would then opt for the vaccine. In reality, it has accomplished the opposite effect. According to the results of recent polls on mumsnet.com, just 6% of pregnant women say they definitely will take the swine flu vaccine to protect their children.

WHO Claim: Regulatory procedures for pandemic vaccines are rigorous and do not compromise safety.

According to the WHO, they attempt to shorten the time between the emergence of pandemic viruses and the availability of safe and effective vaccines.

For example, to fast-track vaccines, they only require minimal data from manufacturers who already have licensed influenza vaccines if they intend on using the same manufacturing process for pandemic vaccines.

One such method used in Europe is to conduct advance studies using a “mock-up” vaccine that contains an active ingredient for an influenza virus that has not circulated recently in human populations.

When testing these mock-up vaccines, it is very possible to release the novel influenza virus into the population, as its purpose is to “mimic the novelty of a pandemic virus” and “greatly expedite regulatory approval.”

Why are the potential effects of releasing a viral strain to which humans have acquired NO immunity for? This alone is an extremely dangerous practice which leaves gaping holes in the safety protocols at the WHO.

They also claim that fast-tracked vaccines will require post-inoculation testing to validate vaccine safety. "Time constraints mean that clinical data at the time when pandemic vaccines are first administered will inevitably be limited. Further testing of safety and effectiveness will need to take place after administration of the vaccine has begun.” In other words, the first groups or populations treated with the vaccine are human experiments.

Reality: This clearly demonstrates the irresponsible nature of WHO pandemic policy. The fast-tracked pandemic vaccines they attempt to regulate and approve are those with the least safety testing prior to being used. This potentially gives vaccine manufacturers the green light to develop medically approved poison with no regard to human health. They compromise safety in every respect.

WHO Claim: Influenza vaccines have been used for more than 60 years and have an established record of safety in all age groups.

Reality: For the last 60 years, influenza vaccines have contained combinations of the following: Ammonium sulfate, polysorbate 80, thimerosal, formaldehyde, egg or chicken protein, antibiotics and aluminum, among others. Each of the above ingredients are toxic and pose a scientifically established hazard when injected into the human body. The long-term adverse effects of vaccines and their additives are no longer questioned by hundreds of internationally recognized scientists. The facts are clear, the risk of vaccines outweigh any benefits to human health.

Inoculations are the true weapons of mass destruction, and have absolutely no correlation to disease prevention. Vaccines have caused millions of chronic health ailments and deaths in the last 60 years. The statements made by the WHO claiming "an established record of safety in all age groups" is at the very least outlandish and criminal.

Reference Sources
September 8, 2009