The science of incrementalism is a very simple and
effective method of working to achieve a specific
goal. It relies on many small changes enacted over
time in order to create a larger broad based change.
World powers have embraced this systematized knowledge
and applied it to the gradual deterioration of human
health for one purpose - control.
In order to control humanity, you need to control
their health. The long-term planning to effectuate
this concept has taken thousands of years to perfect
and model, but today the intended results are undeniable.
The theories and hypotheses have been effectively
molded and cloaked into practical applications. Their
surreptitious nature has fooled billions of people
who could not even acknowledge the existence of this
paragon. That is, until now.
We can no longer deny the systemic and gradual destruction
of health. It is everywhere and worldwide. We are
passive observers and painful bearers. We have chosen
the ignorant path to health for far too long and it
is time to realize why. If we analyze the process
of how health has been taken from us, we can better
appreciate how to take it back.
What is Eugenics?
Behind every door, under every rock, as far back
as can documented, eugenics has always been found
to play a crucial role in orchestrating human health
and its direction. One aspect of eugenics is the belief
in modifying the qualities of humans to discourage
reproduction of inheritable undesirable traits. For
example, Nazi eugenics were racially-based social
policies that targeted those humans they identified
as "life unworthy of life", including but
not limited to the criminal, degenerate, dissident,
feeble-minded, homosexual, idle, insane, religious,
and weak.
Eugenicists advocate specific policies that (if successful)
they believe will lead to a perceived improvement
of the human gene pool. Since defining what improvements
are desired or beneficial is perceived by many as
a cultural choice rather than a matter that can be
determined objectively (e.g., by empirical, scientific
inquiry), eugenics has often been deemed a pseudoscience.
The most disputed aspect of eugenics has been the
definition of "improvement" of the human
gene pool, such as what is a beneficial characteristic
and what is a defect.
Some of the most destructive dictators in the last
century, Joseph
Stalin, Mao
Zedong and Adolf
Hitler were all influenced by some type of concept
or ideal involving eugenics. Regardless of its intent,
eugenics throughout history has only led to the mass
slaughter of innocent human beings.
The most sinister dictatorships and communist paradigms
killed approximately 175 million people in the 20th
century. Many historians worldwide have suggested
that the worst of tyrannical governments ended with
Mao. However, that was only the beginning of an era,
or a change in the ways the eugenicists approached
and exercised their control over governments and humanity
itself. Why settle for millions of deaths through
any regime, when there are easier more effective ways
to kill billions under the cloak of good will?
By the time Mao had well established his destructive
path, the eugenicists had already devised a long-term
plan of genocide that conventional weaponry could
never match. Soft kill weapons integrated within vaccines,
all consumables and the environment would ultimately
provide the most effective platform for human extermination.
The Bilderberg
group, Trilateral
commission, Council
of Foreign Relations and various other world shadow
governments have all assisted in the creation of an
invisible empire with strong ties to eugencists. There
are many theories on exactly who presides as the master
puppeteers for modern day eugenics, but for the purposes
of this discussion, we will maintain that the global
elite and world powers are the eugenicists. They all
have a unilateral mission and their controllers are
irrelevant. It is the universal eugenics ideal that
must be defeated.
Keep The World Poisoned Indefinitely!
Eugenicists and the global elite have long advocated
for draconian population reductions over the past
several centuries. For example, Thomas Malthus argued
that the population growth, by the poor, inevitably
outstrips food production and leads to a massive retaliation
from Mother Nature (i.e., Malthusian Controls). His
infamous Malthusian Controls which are
taught to every first year sociology student, has
become a cornerstone belief for many modern day globalists
who advocate population control by any means necessary.
This radical and dangerous idea promotes the unproven
notion that the poor deserve to die because there
are too many of them for the Earth to adequately support.
Malthus believed that higher wages and welfare should
be withheld from the great unwashed because he believed
that these two factors would allow the poor to survive
and exponentially breed, thus compounding the overpopulation
problem.
Under the guise of population control, and through
the precise science of incrementalism, eugenics has
been able to passively and globally achieve its goal
with little or no physical force to the masses. Step
by step, simply through the process of introducing
junk
science, political manipulation and compartmentalization
of public officials, we have witnessed the gradual
advancement of genetically
modified organisms, toxins in our food and living
space, geoengineering
operations to spray poisons in our air, chemical agents
delivered in our blood stream through vaccines,
and a medical system specifically designed (by iatrogenicity)
to prolong a permanent state of disease or accelerate
death. It is the perfect plan to destroy human
health, create zero population growth and reap
the profits in the process.
Sustainable profits continue because the disease based
system continues to treat, rather than prevent
disease. A sick patient is a profitable one and
easily manipulated. The eugenicists are well aware
of this fact. There is no viable business model in
the prevention of disease and its mere suggestion
is ludicrous to the eugenicists. Disease prevention
contradicts their objectives and coincidentally interferes
with profits.
Many people are suspicious to the reality of this
premise dismissing it as conspiracy. However, when
discussing the facts and asking appropriate questions,
it is difficult if not impossible to dismiss the maliciousness
of the eugenics agenda.
We know cigarettes cause cancer, so why do we continue
selling them? We know fluoride
causes cancer, so why do we continue fluoridating
the water supply? We know pesticides
cause cancer, so why do we allow them in the conventional
food system? We know vaccines
contain heavy metals and preservatives which cause
neurological
damage in children, so why do we continue inoculating?
We know polysorbate
80, potassium
sorbate, sodium
benzoate, MSG,
aspartame,
soy
lecithin, and countless others are lethal to the
human body, so why do we not ban these additives?
We know the dangers of genetically
modified (GM) foods, so why do we continue using
GM soy,
corn and many others in the food supply for illegal
human experiments? The list of questions goes on and
on.
Regardless of the industry, every time the dangers
of specific toxins
are exposed, they are replaced with other types of
toxins, sometimes more virulent than the original.
This is especially evident in the manufacture of injectables
including vaccines, insulin and other pharmaceutical
applications. The goal invariably continues on the
same path - to keep world populations saturated with
the highest levels of disease inducing poisions possible.
It is also important to highlight that regardless
of the industry, the eventual discovery of how these
toxic substances negatively affect human health is
always decades behind what the eugenicists have already
confirmed to be detrimental to humanity.
How Does Incrementalism Work?
If the public witnessed the price of gasoline increase
by 120% in one day, there would likely be outrage
and riots. However, the same increase over an extended
period of time of 5 years, regardless of its validity
or invalidity compared to true market price, will
instigate little or no resistance from the public.
This is a factual example in both the United States
and Canada from 2003 to 2008. It clearly demonstrates
the power of incrementalism on human psychology. Minimize
confrontation and maximize results.
The incremental approach commanded by the eugenicists
employs the most effective methods of reducing any
obstruction by international confrontations over intractable
issues such as population reduction. Furthermore,
their approach relies on resolving any conflict issues
that could threaten their ability to advance their
interests. This greatly reduces the magnitude of problems
that could otherwise not be eliminated with any other
method previously utilized.
For example, in the 20th century, it can be postulated
that most, if not all of the international conflict
issues around population reduction could not be solved
by basic round table discussions. Military force was
a natural and unfortunate consequence of these failures.
An alternative form of compliance would inevitably
be required to avoid successive military confrontations.
The eugenicists then learned to apply many different
types of incremental "treatments", some
of which required the cooperative efforts of contending
political parties within the international community.
Others were implemented unilaterally. Similarly, while
some treatments were relatively easy to implement,
others required that politcial and public officials
developed new dispute-handling skills or secure the
assistance of outside professionals.
For instance, if any disputes arose regarding the
scientific validation of vaccines or their effectiveness,
controlled opposition and fictitious medical specialists
would be used to fabricate statistics and data in
reputable medical
journals to sway opinion. Many politicians and
public health officials would then unknowingly use
the fabricated information to validate the eugenicists
mandate. For every new disease, an additional increase
in vaccine dosage or frequency would be applied. For
each new vaccine, a study would be falsified to justify
its effectiveness and requisite belief thereof.
Unlike other forms of dispute resolution used by competing
governments, the incremental approach was a workable
strategy in situations where resolution-based approaches
were not effective. By infiltrating politicians and
developing small-scale interventions, governments
could be easily coerced into accepting the false model
designed by the eugenicists. In most cases, this would
also allow for the resolution of sub-issues before
moving on to the more substantive issues in contention.
Again, the historical administration of vaccination
programs serves as a typical illustration of this
strategy. For every sub-issue and counter approach
raised by intergovernmental public health agencies,
such as vaccine toxicity or schedule frequency, world
health agencies and medical establishments would consistently
fall back on the false model incrementally developed
through the decades to validate vaccine program initiatives.
Any intervention by those opposed to the prescribed
mainstream approach are criticized, chastised or simply
ignored regardless of the validity of their arguments.
The delusive foundation of vaccination programs are
reinforced over and over again since their power resides
not on truth, but on repetition of the incremental
infrastructure itself.
The Multi-tiered Approach to Destroy Health
Vaccinations
were never invented with the intention of preventing
disease. Their sole purpose was to create the most
dangerous and repulsive system of blood poisoning
to kill the undesirables and control the population.
Vaccines have always been and continue to be the most
effective bioweapon ever employed by the eugenicists.
Many medical experts agree that vaccines are likely
the single biggest cause of chronic illness in developed
nations.
The 18th century saw the first vaccine produced for
any disease. The 19th century produced 7 vaccines.
With the advancement of medical technology, there
were more than 20 additional major vaccines developed
in the 20th century. Some vaccine researchers have
estimated that the number of new vaccines in the 21st
century could well exceed 500 with over 100 vaccines
currently under development. In the United States
alone, 36 vaccinations are recommended for children
by the time they reach 6 years of age.
The 20th century also served as a breeding ground
for the development of thousands of deadly chemicals
that were specifically designed to disrupt the nervous,
reproductive, immune and hormonal systems of the human
body causing cancer,
infertility,
heart
disease, diabetes,
brain
damage and other illnesses and disorders.
Bisphenol
A (BPA), dioxins,
phthalates,
polychlorinated
biphenyls (PCBs), dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethanes
(DDT), polybrominated
diphenyl ethers (PBDE), furans
and many others were all invented in the last 200
years ago. However, under the pretense of increasing
the manufacturing sector, their integration within
developed societies has conveniently devastated human
health. After the second industrial revolution, targeted
industries increasingly integrated these chemicals
into all end applications such as plastics, cosmetics,
lubricants, toys, food storage devices, building materials,
pharmaceutical and nutritional supplements, cosmetics,
lubricants, insecticides, electrical components, coolants,
furniture, upholstery and many other applications.
The intention was to embed as many toxins as possible
within the fabric of society. A few hundred chemicals
in the 19th century quickly became tens of thousands.
We currently use more than 110,000 chemicals to sustain
our modern way of life. Not only do we have unacceptable
limits of contaminants in our food, air and water,
but we are constantly "upping the ante."
Every year, we invent more than 2,000
new substances, most of them contaminants, which are
emitted into the environment and which are consequently
present in food, air, soil and water. We come into
contact with more than 500 of these contaminants every
day, and there are already approximately 200 chemicals
in the average person's body fat at any given time.
These numbers will certainly rise for future generations
unless the world adopts more responsible manufacturing
protocols.
New disease symptoms that cannot be diagnosed are
occurring at record rates worldwide. The National
Academy of Sciences estimates that 15% of the population
has Multiple Chemical Sensitivity (MCS), however,
physicians who practice environmental medicine estimate
that chemical sensitivity affects up to 50% of today's
population.
Many scientists had exposed the harm of many of these
chemicals, but it took decades for the information
to reach the public. The eugenicists are masters at
ensuring that the release of such information strictly
coincides with their best interests. Whistleblowers
who expose classified information and against the
eugenics agenda, have historically been executed by
black operations worldwide. Modern day examples include
dozens of assassinated
microbiologists who have worked with government
agencies and were a threat to expose the true nature
of the H1N1 swine flu agenda, or free
energy inventors who have been terminated because
they had workable solutions to obtain
clean and abundant sources of energy.
The weaponization of food has also become a hallmark
of modern day eugenics. Once world powers had acquired
the knowledge to biochemically transform the food
supply, it would quickly become one of the most successful
strategies to control the health of the global populace
and propel genocidal interventions when necessary.
The use of petroleum-based fertilizers, genetically
modified organisms, irradiation
and sewage
sludge are just a few of the common practices
which sterilize the nutritional value of food.
By incorporating agricultural poisons such as pesticides
and herbicides,
and gradually expanding their manufacture and use
in the latter part of the 20th century, a system to
chemically alter all conventional fresh produce was
in place.
Agricultural poisons are now among the most widely
used chemicals in the world. The United States and
Canada allow more exposure to pesticides than almost
every other industrialized nation. They are sprayed
on forests, lakes, city parks, lawns, and playing
fields, and in hospitals, schools, offices, and homes,
and are contained in a huge variety of products from
shampoos to shelf paper, mattresses to shower curtains.
Pesticides and herbicides have been confirmed to be
a significant risk factor is causing cancer, infertility
and neurological disorders. 100% of pregnant
women have pesticides in their placenta.
GM
foods have also been an effective weapon in the
manipulation of the food supply. Since James Watson
and Francis Crick cracked the genetic code in 1953,
the human engineering of genes has been a possibility.
But it took two decades for their discovery, which
won them the Nobel Prize in 1962, to yield results
in the lab and two more for GM products to appear
in the shops.
In the 1990s, biotechnology moved out of the laboratory
into farms and became a boom industry. In 1990 the
first GM food, a yeast, was approved in the UK. The
government of Canada was testing at least 50 different
types of genetically modified foods on their population
by 1993, and this was without the consent of their
citizens.
Spearheaded by the eugenicists, Monsanto
company has been the largest player in the GM foods
game. They have single handedly made the United States
the world's biggest producer of GM foods, pesticides
and herbicides. Founded in 1901, Monsanto has manufactured
industrial chemicals (e.g. sulphuric acid), plastics
and synthetics, and saccharin, a carcinogenic artificial
sweetener. It has also produced or granted production
licenses for most of the world's toxic PCB's which
are now mostly banned worldwide.
By the 1940's, Monsanto had begun focusing on plastics
and synthetic fabrics like polystyrene (still widely
used in food packaging and other consumer products),
which once ranked fifth in the Environtal Protection
Agency's listing of chemicals whose production generates
the most total hazardous waste.
During World War II, Monsanto played a significant
role in the Manhattan Project to develop the atom
bomb. Following the war, they championed the use of
chemical pesticides in agriculture, and began manufacturing
the herbicide 2,4,5-T, which contained dioxin, a toxin
which Monsanto knowingly used to contaminate a wide
range of products.
Between 1975 and 1981 a research program was established
in Monsanto's Agricultural Division to strategize
the advancement of genetically modified organisms.
By the mid 1990's, more than 50% of the world's conventional
soy and corn (the two most integrated foods), were
genetically modified. We now have three major categories
of GM foods: crops (i.e. soy, cotton, canola, and
corn), dairy products, meat, enzymes and additives
created from GM bacteria and fungus.
The eugenics researchers and monsanto scientists
have known about the dangers associated with GM foods
for decades. Potentially disastrous effects are inevitable
from undetected harmful substances in the development
process of GM foods.
A popular method used by scientists is to systematically
create plants that produce their own pesticides by
using genes from bacteria. They would do this by using
genes from bacteria that produce their own pesticides.
The bacteria are called Bt for Bacillus Thuringiensis
and the pesticidal toxin it creates is called Bt-toxin.
Scientists would make millions of copies of these
genes, which are either shot into millions of cells
or infected into the cell by bacteria. The hope is
that some of the genes make it into the DNA of some
of those cells. The problem is, they never know what
part of the chromosome the new gene is being introduced
into.
Before they multiply and insert the gene construct,
they add an antibiotic resistant marker gene. This
new gene creates a protein that protects the cell
from a specific antibiotic. Next, they dowse that
plate of cells with antibiotics. It kills off most
of the cells except the very few where the transgene
made it into the DNA-where the antibiotic resistant
gene is functioning. Thus, the surviving cells are
antibiotic resistant. The surviving cells are cloned
into GM plants. Each cell of each plant now contains
the gene that produces the Bt-toxin. It also contains
the antibiotic resistant gene, which is now in our
food.
If antibiotic
resistant genes transfer, they might create super
diseases, resistant to antibiotics. Viral proteins
might suppress our own body's viral defenses, or the
proteins may be toxic. If the Bt gene transfers, it
could theoretically turn our intestinal flora into
living pesticide factories, possibly for the long
term.
The biotech industry is also well aware that the viral
promoters they insert into genes can actually turn
on other genes. This may cause it to overproduce its
protein in high volume, which might be an allergen,
toxin, carcinogen, or anti-nutrient.
GM foods are an imminent threat to humanity's food
supply. Besides the ethical concerns, genetic pollution
is self-perpetuating. It can never be reversed or
cleaned up. Genetic mistakes will be passed on to
all future generations of a species. Wind, rain, birds,
bees, and insect pollinators have begun carrying genetically-altered
pollen into adjoining fields, polluting the DNA of
crops of organic and non-GM farmers. This has been
happening all over the world for more than a decade.
Theoretically, it genetic pollution continues, it
could obliterate the world's natural organic food
supply. Use of herbicide-resistant crops will also
lead to a accelerated increase in the use of herbicides,
resulting
in even greater pollution of our food and water
with toxic agrochemicals.
This is the world the eugenicists have primed for
future generations.
Compartmentalization and Political Control
If governments are so concerned with the health and
welfare of their people, then why would they persist
in developing an infrastructure of agencies and departments
whose policies precisely direct the opposite? How
have millions of public officials participated in
the demise of public health? Through compartmentalization,
dimensions of public policy have translated these
imposed false assumptions and junk hypotheses of health
and extended them into functional instruments of procedure
and action.
For example, a director of public health will not
question the directives from federal or regional health
authorities, just as a public health coordinator will
not question orders from his or her public health
director. This hierarchical system operates in every
country in the world, running all facets and divisions
of government. If people want to keep their jobs,
they do not question higher authorities.
All venomous practices by modern day eugenics (and
historically) are completely amalgamated within the
political and public policies of government. Moreover,
they are always imposed under the pretense of advancing
our health, safety, environment or economy.
Although eugenics policies or consequences of alternative
policy instruments are continually evaluated by successive
generations, the maintained hypotheses imposed include
perfect implementation with almost no feedback effects
from interest groups and coalition formations. This
is what allows the continuous maldistribution of political
influences in goverment structure. This is also the
basis for the conceptualization of bargains and compromises
that are undertaken to shape government directives
that are acceptable to those who have the greatest
capacity to obstruct such structural reforms, as well
as to others who have stakes in the outcome.
In essence, public health policies are never advanced
to the benefit of the people. They are simply a controlled
instrument that eugenicists have used to incrementally
tip the scales of authority in their favour. As long
as eugenicists control world powers, corporations,
governance and policy, the long-term advancement of
human health is unattainable.
An prime example of how eugencists use corporations
and political control to dominate governence is the
advancement of Codex
Alimentarius. Established in 1963, Codex Alimentarius
is the thinly-veiled propaganda arm of global conglomerates
who do everything they can to control and limit individual
options to maintain or increase health. This collection
of international standards and codes of practice is
scheduled to be implemented on December 31, 2009 in
the U.S. and Canada. According to the projections
of the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Food
and Agriculture Organization (FAO), a minimum of 3
billion people will die from the Codex mandated vitamin
and mineral guideline alone. Among a plethora of other
dangerous guidelines, it will also reintroduce carcinogenic
pesticides that were banned worldwide in 1991.
It's About Controlling The Media
The resistance offered to counteract the momentous
strength of the eugenics movement has been futile.
The failures to combat and halt their progress are
largely attributed to the ignorance and programming
of world populations by the mainstream
media.
More than 95% of the world's media is owned by six
companies who all conspire to promote the eugenicist's
lies, deceptions and disinformation. The suppression
of competition and the establishment of local monopolies
on the dissemination of news and opinion have characterized
the rise of these media empires. Many have persisted
for well over a century, injecting complete fallacies
and rewriting the historical record of humanity, while
continually promoting the eugenics archetypes of lie,
cheat and steal. They have, without question shaped
public perception to their will. Aside from the internet,
they essentially remain unopposed.
The internet has been a crucial medium in bringing
truth to the people. Sophisticated alternative news
sources, web portals, radio, blogs, email and chats
have allowed more people to seek and learn the facts
online. For this reason, there has been an aggressive
push by the eugenicists to censor the internet before
the masses awaken to the reality of their false paradigm.
World powers have already arranged for the modification
of the internet from a free and public structured
network, to a private, fee-based and fully censored
system by 2011. A successful conversion of internet
backbones to a privatized central hub (mirroring the
distribution of network television), will certainly
end most digital forms of free speech. There are currently
more than one million pages online devoted to stopping
internet censorship.
How to Break Free From The Cycle
We must unite and realize that we are not victims
of circumstances, we are the creators of circumstances.
The eugenics agenda would not have survived as long
as it has without billions of people cooperating and
accepting it as reality. Gandhi said it best: "Nobody
can hurt me without my permission."
Gandhi also said we have to be the change we want
to see in the world. It will not be possible to defeat
the eugenicists without changing ourselves and the
way we live.
Stop buying into the system that is destroying our
health. Stop watching TV and using tech gadgets that
emit electromagnetic
frequency. Stop buying and consuming toxic chemicals
in cosmetics and foods. Stop using pharaceutical drugs
and vaccines. Stop using technology to replace human
interaction. Stop all behaviors associated with encouraging
complicated mainstream lifestyles.
Some basic recommendations to break free:
- Lead a simpler life.
- Grow your own garden.
- Get plenty of sunlight.
- Get plenty of rest.
- Eat together as a family and interact with each
other.
- Eat organic fresh foods and as many raw
foods as possible.
- Refuse to drink or eat any food with additives
or artificial
flavours.
- Refuse to buy clothing or furniture manufactured
with toxins.
- Read about nutrition and exercise and then put theory
into practice.
- Learn as much as possible about aging
and immunity
- Learn about the 5
do's and don'ts to improve your health
- Research and use multiple sources to validate everything
you read.
- Activate higher brain levels by meditating.
- Take responsibility for your health.
- Find your purpose.
- Become active in informing others.
- Create a website, newsletter or blog.
The solutions are incredibly simple, but so many people
are entrenched in the programming of false societal
values and beliefs, that many of these recommendations
are very daunting for most.
However difficult or tedious the adaptation process
may be, the only limits we place on ourselves are
those we believe in. If we cannot change ourselves,
what power will we ever have to change others and
our world? It starts with you.
Population Control:
The Eugenics Connection
END GAME: Official
Movie Eugenics
Eugenicists' Quotes
183, 190, 195, 206, 211, 214, 224, 225, 226
August 27, 2009