The suits were filed by parents of children diagnosed
with attention deficit disorder and attention-deficit
hyperactivity disorder. They claimed the disorders
were created and put into the DSM to stimulate sales
of the Novartis drug Ritalin, a common treatment
for both conditions.
Some psychiatrists worry that the credibility
of their profession will be undermined if the guidelines
are expanded too far or become too specific. In
particular, they worry that fracturing well-documented
disorders into sub-disorders based on flimsy evidence
could prevent patients from getting appropriate
treatment.
Those concerns alarmed critics when several controversial
disorders were added to the manual's fourth edition,
typically referred to as the DSM-IV.
"Many of us thought they went overboard," Torrey
said. He joked that the range of disorders in the
DSM-IV is so wide "you can fit almost everybody
you know into one."
Much of the controversy surrounded personality
disorders and mental illness among children. Among
the most recently defined mental ailments, several
drew particular scorn: mathematics disorder, reading
disorder and disorder of written expression.
Based on definitions in the DSM-IV, naughty children
can be diagnosed with oppositional defiant disorder
and cigarette smokers with nicotine dependence.
"If You're Breathing, You're In The Book," a 1994
newspaper headline in the Greensboro, N.C., News
& Record declared. Another newspaper asked,
"Is it True? Are We All Crazy?"
More recently, doctors have begun suggesting disorders
that should be included in the next revision of
the manual, due in 2011.
Caplan said one doctor is proposing a new diagnosis,
relational disorder, which she summarizes as a dysfunctional
relationship in which "neither person is mentally
ill but the relationship is."
She said she wonders what would happen when an
afflicted couple visits the doctor's office for
help. "The psychiatrist takes out a pill. ... Where
does the psychiatrist put it?" she asked. Other
doctors have suggested broadening the definition
of bipolar disorder, an illness once known as manic
depression, characterized by extreme mood swings
from elation to deep despair.
Under the proposed changes in the DSM, "everyone
who's had any kind of mood swings in their life
becomes bipolar," Torrey said. "And because of that,
the concept loses meaning."
While the APA's Narrow agrees the jury is out
on expanding the definition of bipolar disorder
- particularly when it would enrich the drug manufacturers
whose medicines are used to treat it - he argues
that refining the definition of old disorders and
identifying new ones is important. "It means patients
are more likely to get better treatment for their
disorders," he said. "An accurate diagnosis leads
to an accurate treatment."
The findings of the IED study released in June
support that view, according to Ronald C. Kessler,
the Harvard scientist who led the research team.
The researchers found that IED often appears in
adolescence but is later compounded by other problems
such as alcoholism and depression. Identifying and
treating the anger attacks early on might help prevent
the problems that boil up, he said.
The study found that over a lifetime, people with
IED averaged 43 rage attacks resulting in $1,359
in property damage. "The question is, can you make
them into regular people, and there is evidence
we can," Kessler said.
Part of the reason for public skepticism about
psychological disorders is a long-standing stigma
surrounding mental illness, said Bob Corolla, a
spokesman for the National Alliance for the Mentally
Ill.
"There are still people who believe mental illnesses
are a function of character and not illness," he
said. "If you interview Tom Cruise, he might tell
you that."
The movie star is a member of the Church of Scientology,
which eschews psychiatric treatment, and he publicly
criticized actress Brooke Shields in 2005 for taking
medication for postpartum depression.
Corolla said he first learned of IED from a short-lived
Fox comedy called Head Cases, in which one character,
a lawyer, had the disorder.
"In a trial, he hit the other attorney in the
head with a law book, and I wondered if it was even
a disorder," Corolla said.
A scientist with the alliance later confirmed
to him that IED was legitimate. In fact, researchers
have found that the propensity for angry outbursts
might be inherited - and regarded as a kind of epilepsy.
"We are not as concerned about what they call
it," Corolla said. "Take the name away, you're still
dealing with a set of symptoms that need treatment."