Seeking to assess the effect of third-party prayer
on patient outcomes, investigators found no evidence
for divine intervention. They did, however, detect
a possible proof for the power of negative thinking.
The three-year Study of the Therapeutic Effects
of Intercessory Prayer (STEP), published in the April
4 American Heart Journal, was the largest-ever
attempt to apply scientific methods to measure the
influence of prayer on the well-being of another.
It examined 1,800 patients undergoing heart-bypass
surgery. On the eve of the operations, church groups
began two weeks of praying for one set of patients.
Each recipient had a praying contingent of about 70,
none of whom knew the patient personally. The study
found no differences in survival or complication rates
compared with those who did not receive prayers. The
only statistically significant blip appeared in a
subgroup of patients who were prayed for and knew
it. They experienced a higher rate of postsurgical
heart arrhythmias (59 versus 52 percent of unaware
subjects).
The research team--a psychologist, clergy and doctors
from six institutions, including Harvard Medical School
and the Mayo Clinic--speculated that nerves might
have been to blame. "We know that high levels of adrenaline
from the anxiety response can make fibrillation worse,"
said Charles Bethea, a physician at Integris Baptist
Heart Hospital, a study site in Oklahoma City, in
an April press conference. "The patient might think,
'Am I so sick that they have to call in the prayer
team?'" Dean Marek, chief chaplain at the Mayo Clinic,
saw the problem as a possible flaw in the study design:
"The sense of community was not there. You could call
it impersonal prayer rather than intercessory prayer."
Stopping short of suggesting that the healing power
of prayers by friends and family might reside in the
personal connections rather than in the prayers, the
authors stated that they have no plans for a follow-up
study. This one, sponsored largely by the John Templeton
Foundation, cost $2.4 million.
