 |
 |

|
Health
Headlines
Get
the latest news in prevention and health matters. This
feature includes daily postings and recent archives to
keep you up to date on health reports and wires around
the world. |
 |
Weekly
Wellness
Get
informed with weekly wellness facts in a diversity of
health topics from prevention to fitness and nutrition. |
 |
Tips
Great
tips on what you need to know about keeping healthy and
active all year round. |
|
|
|

|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Safety
Concerns With Teflon
For home cooks and professional chefs, Teflon
might be the best kitchen innovation since sliced bread
became a cliche.
A pan with the nonstick coating makes easy-to-lift omelets
and cleans up like a dream. The concept of a cooking surface
so smooth that nothing sticks has even leapt into the
political lexicon. An American leader who weathered scandal
and criticism became known as the Teflon president.
Now, something finally seems to be sticking to Teflon
— a nasty environmental tempest that has maker DuPont
Co. and cookware companies worried that garage sales in
the coming weeks will be stuffed with discarded nonstick
pots and pans.
Home chefs have questioned the safety of nonstick cookware
since an Environmental Protection Agency advisory board
asked regulators in late January to examine whether a
chemical that gets slippery Teflon and similar coatings
to bond to a pan can cause cancer. About 70% of the cookware
sold in the U.S. has a nonstick coating, according to
the Cookware Manufacturers Assn.
"I stopped using those pans because of what I have heard
about Teflon and carcinogen properties over the past few
months," said Janeen Cunningham of Seal Beach, who recently
tossed four nonstick pans into the back of her garage.
"I am not sure what to do with them now."
Cunningham now cooks with older stainless-steel pans,
using a thin coating of olive oil to prevent food from
sticking.
Valley Village resident Tim Kislan shares her concerns.
"I worry about it because you can see when the coating
chips off," said Kislan, who says about half of his 15
pots and pans have nonstick surfaces. "Maybe something
is getting into the food."
Kislan said he limited the use of nonstick pans to cooking
eggs and sauces — low-temperature endeavors —
and saved hotter cooking for copper and steel pans.
Both Teflon maker DuPont and the EPA said cooks had little
to worry about. The EPA raised questions about the chemical,
perfluorooctanoic acid, or PFOA, after studies found it
to be in low levels in the blood of 90% of Americans,
EPA Acting Assistant Administrator Susan Hazen said. Although
the source of the exposure is unknown, she said cookware
was an unlikely culprit.
PFOA is in the nonstick substance sprayed onto cookware.
The pan then goes through a heating process in which virtually
all of the PFOA is destroyed, according to DuPont.
The Food and Drug Administration has been able to detect
traces of the chemical in tests in which it has ground
up the surface of cookware, which is far beyond the abuse
pots take in home cooking, DuPont said.
Still, mindful that sales could fall, DuPont touted the
safety of Teflon in full-page advertisements this month
in eight daily newspapers, including the Los Angeles Times,
the New York Times and USA Today. The ad shows an actual-size
frying pan with the words, "Teflon Non-Stick Coating Is
Safe."
"We stand behind the safety of our products and we wanted
to get that out to consumers," said Dan Turner, a spokesman
for Wilmington, Del.-based DuPont.
But some question whether such ads reassure cooks or increase
the public's anxiety.
Christine Bruhn, director of the Center for Consumer Research
at UC Davis, recalled that apple sales plummeted in the
1980s after grocery stores put up signs in their produce
sections announcing that their fruit was free of the chemical
Alar, used to improve the ripening and look of apples.
"The signs just created concerns," she said.
A DuPont rival worried about how the controversy would
affect sales.
"Obviously it is a concern for us even though there is
no proof of PFOA present in nonstick pans," said Scott
Meyer, president of T-Fal, the West Orange, N.J.-based
subsidiary of French cookware maker Groupe SEB.
T-Fal has launched a line of uncoated pans as a diversification
move, though Meyer insisted that wasn't a direct response
to the PFOA issue. The company has fielded hundreds of
consumer inquiries about the issue but hasn't seen sales
of its goods fall, Meyer said.
"The concern is that there is a steady drip-drip about
this and it will become part of the common knowledge about
cookware even though people won't get PFOA from cookware,"
Meyer said.
Some retailers, including Target Corp., which carries
T-Fal, Teflon and other nonstick products, declined to
discuss the matter.
At Wal-Mart Stores Inc., "we are monitoring the issue,"
said Karen Burke, spokeswoman for the Bentonville, Ark.,
retail chain. "We are working with our suppliers and the
regulatory agencies to reduce the presence of PFOA in
products in our stores."
Burke declined to say whether sales of nonstick cookware
had slowed.
A spokeswoman for kitchen goods retailer Sur la Table
said the company had fielded consumer questions about
the safety of nonstick cookware.
"We tell people who are concerned that there is no evidence
that nonstick cookware is a hazard," said Susanna Linse,
spokeswoman for the Seattle-based company.
But the upscale pot peddler wouldn't be affected much
by the controversy, because the chain sells mostly uncoated
copper and stainless steel cookware, Linse said. "People
may think they have to cook with nonstick, but they don't
realize how easy it is to clean quality cookware," she
said.
The chemical for decades has been considered essential
in nonstick and stain-resistant products. In addition
to cookware, it is used by the aerospace, transportation,
textile and electronics industries for such products as
wiring and fabrics.
Last year the EPA fined DuPont $16.5 million, alleging
that the company hid data on the toxicity and health effects
of PFOA for more than 20 years and contaminated the drinking
water supply in the Ohio River Valley, next to a DuPont
plant in West Virginia. It was the largest administrative
fine in EPA history.
PFOA causes liver cancer, reduced birth weight, immune-system
suppression and developmental problems in laboratory animals
exposed to high doses. In humans, the effects of lower
doses are unknown, but it is transferred to fetuses. An
ongoing study by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of
Public Health in Baltimore found the compound in the umbilical
cord blood of 298 of 300 newborns.
Because there is little information about how the chemical
affects humans, the EPA asked U.S. companies last month
to voluntarily eliminate public exposure to the chemical.
DuPont pledged to meet the deadlines.
But the voluntary phaseout will not end the sale of Teflon
and other products like T-Fal's cookware, though it is
expected to curtail the release of the chemical into the
atmosphere. Regulators have to act, said Joe Hotchkiss,
chairman of Cornell University's department of food science,
because they don't know whether the problems that result
from a high level of PFOA exposure in animals will crop
up in humans with much lower contamination.
"We just don't know what it means. It could be nothing,
or it could be a lot," Hotchkiss said.
Professional chefs are just starting to learn of the environmental
issues surrounding PFOA, said Sumi Chang, who owns the
Europane bakery and cafe in Pasadena.
But the pastry and bread chef has a more basic reason
for avoiding nonstick cookware.
"It makes a chocolate cake look shiny," Chang said.
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |

|
|
|